On this page

IMAT Research Lab

IMAT 2025 Physics Report

We examine 6 questions in 2025 IMAT test via model selection, logic, DOK, problem solving, question format, estimated time and distractor structure.

Publication date: 10 August 20266 questionsQ55-Q60

Executive summary

Physics was represented only with 6 questions in 2025 IMAT exam, although it is one of the highest load areas in terms of average difficulty and estimated time. The average analytical difficulty is 13.17/25, median difficulty 14.5/25 and the average estimated time is 65 seconds.

6

question physics

Q55-Q60

10.0%

share in the test

6 of 60 questions

13.17 / 25

average difficulty

Research Lab index

14.5 / 25

Median difficulty

close to high band

65 sec

average estimated time

not measured from candidate response times

4 / 6

DOK 3 questions

Q55, Q56, Q58, Q59

The center finds: 2025 physics load comes from formula recall to choose the right physical model, determining the right variable/direction and coordinating several solution steps together.

Research methodology

The analysis covers six questions from Q55 to Q60. Each question is coded by main topic, subtopic, format, primary skill, DOK, language and reading load, calculation load, reasoning load, distractor strength, estimated time and syllabus area.

Difficulty scores and estimated times are not official IMAT statistics; they are analytical classifications produced by IMAT Academy Research Lab. Candidate accuracy rates, option distributions and recorded solution times were not available.

2025 General Profile of Physics

The physical part creates 10% of the 60-factor paper. Although the number of questions is small, the five issues of six problems were coded as Solving, four were coded at DOK 3.

Physics Load Profile
ComponentAverageComments
Reasoning Load2.83 / 5Accurate model, reference distance, direction and moving phases selection load
Calculation Load2.17 / 5The process is necessary; but the main difficulty is often the decision of the previous model from the process
Distractor Strength3.17 / 5False options are emitted to absolute/ relative speed, series/paralel, direction and distance discrimination

Difficulty band distribution

Low1 - 16.7%
Medium2 - 33.3%
High3 - 50.0%
Very High0 - 0%

Subject architecture and load density

Electricity and Electromagnetism is the most commonly represented main issue with two questions. Kinematics is located in Mechanics, Dynamics and Fluid Mechanics. This distribution shows that different modelling environments are measured instead of a single dominant section.

Main topic distribution

Electricity and Electromagnetism2 - 33.3%
Kinematics1 - 16.7%
Mechanics1 - 16.7%
Dynamics1 - 16.7%
Fluid Mechanics1 - 16.7%
Physics topic distribution
Main topicQuestionShareAvg. difficultyAvg. timeDOK profile
Electricity and Electromagnetism233.3%12.0055.0 sec0/1/1
Dynamics116.7%18.00100.0 sec0/0/1
Fluid Mechanics116.7%6.0025.0 sec1/0/0
Kinematics116.7%15.0080.0 sec0/0/1
Mechanics116.7%16.0075.0 sec0/0/1

The averages of single question should not be read as a challenge of universal issue. Dynamics 18.00 average is based on Q59, Mechanics 16.00 average Q58.

Difficulty Profile

One of the six problems is Low, two Medium, three High bands. With Q59 18/25, not only part of physics, Research Lab is the highest ingredient of 2025 tests according to the data set.

Physics question-level difficulty
QuestionTopicDifficultyBandDOKEstimated time
Q59Dynamics18 / 25HighDOK 3100 sec
Q58Mechanics16 / 25HighDOK 375 sec
Q55Kinematics15 / 25HighDOK 380 sec
Q56Electricity and Electromagnetism14 / 25MediumDOK 370 sec
Q57Electricity and Electromagnetism10 / 25MediumDOK 240 sec
Q60Fluid Mechanics6 / 25LowDOK 125 sec

DOK and depth of knowledge

Four questions are DOK 3 levels: Q55, Q56, Q58 and Q59. These questions require the application to a new problem context, multiple steps ranking and setting the physical model correctly. Q57 DOK 2 is coded as Q60 DOK 1.

Dispersing DOF
DOKQuestion sayısıAnlamı
DOK 11Direct information: hydrostatic pressure force is right on the surface
DOK 21Conceptual distinction: traditional current and electron movement
DOK 34Model selection, reference system and multi-step solution in case of new problem
DOK 40No

Measured skills

Problem Solving is the primary skill in five questions. Information Recall is seen only as primary skills in Q60. This is one of the basic profile differences that separates the Physics from Biology and Chemistry.

Physics skill distribution
BeceriQuestion sayısıYorum
Problem Solving5Relative movement, circuit reduction, gravite, dynamic and modeling questions
Information Recall1Direct recall the direction of hydrostatic pressure force

Question formats and modeling structure

Calculation format is used in three questions. Daily- ProblemLife is represented by Scenario-Based and Conceptual Comparison. Direct Knowledge is seen only in Q60. Despite the format variety, the main source of the load is the choice of the previous model from the calculation.

Primary format distribution

Calculation3 - 50.0%
Daily-Life Problem1 - 16.7%
Scenario-Based1 - 16.7%
Conceptual Comparison1 - 16.7%
Direct Knowledge1 - Q60

Language, processing, reasoning and time profile

Average estimated time is 65 seconds and the median is 72.5 seconds. Q59 is estimated at 100 seconds, Q55 at 80 seconds, Q58 at 75 seconds and Q56 at 70 seconds. These are analyst estimates, not recorded candidate times.

Estimated-time bands

30s or six1 - Q60
31-60 sec1 - Q57
61-90 sec3 - Q55, Q56, Q58
Over 90 sec1 - Q59

Reasoning Load is 2.83/5 and Distractor Strength is 3.17/5, both higher than Calculation Load at 2.17/5. This profile supports the conclusion that physics difficulty comes not only from calculation density, but also from selecting the correct model and reference frame.

Distractor architecture

Each of the six questions of physics is coded with different dominant distractor type: absolute vs relative speed, series/parallel reversal, current/electron direction reversal, height etc centre distance, friction/phase change and pressure-force distinguish.

This distractor analysis is not based on candidate option-selection data; structurally classifies the relationship of wrong options with the physical model.

Detailed review based on thread sets

On the Kinematics side, Q55 wants relative movement model. One of the absolute speeds is the basic error way to process directly; the candidate must control the closing speed and a minute closing distance together.

Electricity and Electromagnetism offer two different modeling environments. Q56 asks for two-stage series-paralel resistance reduction; Q57 measures to separate the direction of electron drift with serene current.

Mechanics and Dynamics clusters are single question but high load. The distance separation from the center with height from the surface in Q58 is decisive to install separate free-body model for fixed speed and acceleration motion phases in Q59.

Q60 in Fluid Mechanics is direct-knowledge item. The pressure can be skaler; but the pressure force is right on the surface. This question represents quick knowledge-check layer outside the model-heavy structure in the section.

Item-level analysis of six problems

The following spots explain why Q55-Q60 items create analytical load without republishing the full question text.

Q59

Newton's second law and friction

Difficulty 18/25DOK 3100 sec

The highest graded load-bearing item in 2025 data set. Fixed speed and acceleration motion phases are individually installed; the friction must be retained in both phases. It is to miss out on the element of paddy friction or phase change.

Q58

Gravitation and inverse-square law

Difficulty 16/25DOK 375 sec

It is not enough to know the reverse square law; three Earth radius height from the surface means four radius distance from the center. The center distance mixedness with the coiled tricycle height.

Q55

Relative motion

Difficulty 15/25DOK 380 sec

It is not the absolute speeds of two vehicles in the context of everyday life, but the closing speed is decisive. Unit conversion and one-minute cover decision creates load together.

Q56

Series-parallel resistor networks

Difficulty 14/25DOK 370 sec

While Simetri is helpful, it is necessary to download two-stage: serial resistance in each arm, then parallel equivalent of 100 identical arm. The translated batch/paralel row of printing is reversed.

Q57

Current in metallic conductors

Difficulty 10/25DOK 240 sec

Short but common conceptual reversal targets. The metal wire is charged carrier electrons; the electron drift is the opposite of current direction.

Q60

Hydrostatic pressure

Difficulty 6/25DOK 125 sec

Single Low item of the department. It is sewn on force surface, which is applied to surfaces of the Durgun liquid. No modeling or multi-stage account request.

2025 How to Participate in physics?

2025 is a part that creates high selectiveness with minimal questions. In half High band, two DOK 3 levels. Therefore, the section cannot be explained only with formula know.

The character of the department is to be represented by physical condition: relative speed, circuit reduction, current direction, center distance, two phase force balance and pressure force, different model decisions from each other.

Preparation interests

For candidates prepared after 2025, this profile shows that the oral state is the primary practice of translating to the physical model. The correct distance, direction, reference frame and motion phase should be determined before proceeding to the delegation.

Series-paralel circuit reduction, electron drift separation with acute current, centre-to-centre distance in gravitation questions, friction and phase change in force model, pressure force separation with pressure in fluid Mechanics should be informed again.

These interests do not mean that the same question or rates will be released in the next test; it should be read as evidence-based preparation implication extracted from the 2025 data set.

Limitations and Quality Control

Analytical Difficulty is not the official IMAT metric. Estimated time values are not candidate times observed, but analyst estimates. Student response data, option-selection distribution and real distractor visibility are not available. One year and six questions are not enough to make the sample trend.

All queries are second-pass checked. Coding Confidence is recorded as High in all six issues. There is no Controversy Flag for physics. Full question texts were not republished, only short paraphrase and analytical comments were used.

Technical index: Q55-Q60

The following crawlable HTML table summarizes the basic coding areas of 6 issues in 2025.

2025 IMAT Physics technical index
QMain topicSubtopicFormatPrimary skillDOKDifficultyTimeConverted
Q55KinematicsRelative motionDaily-life problemProblem solvingDOK 31580 secUsing absolute instead of relative speed
Q56Electricity and ElectromagnetismSeries-parallel resistor networksCalculationProblem solvingDOK 31470 secSeries-parallel reversal
Q57Electricity and ElectromagnetismCurrent in metallic conductorsConceptual comparisonConceptual understandingDOK 21040 secDirection reversal
Q58MechanicsGravitation and inverse-square lawCalculationProblem solvingDOK 31675 secUsing height instead of centre distance
Q59DynamicsNewton's second law and frictionScenario-basedProblem solvingDOK 318100 secIgnoring friction or phase change
Q60Fluid MechanicsHydrostatic pressureDirect knowledgeInformation recallDOK 1625 secPressure-force distinction

Citation and Related Reports

IMAT Academy Research Lab. IMAT 2025 Physics Report: Difficulty, DOK, model selection and question-level analysis. Publication date: 10 August 2026. IMAT Academy

This study is an independent Research Lab analysis; it is not the official IMAT statistics or a a publication by the exam authority.